• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Shop
  • Jobs Board
Campaigns & Elections logo

Campaigns & Elections

  • Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Articles
    • Industry News
    • CampaignTech
    • Creative
  • Videos
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Reports
  • Expert Database
  • Events
  • Awards
    • Reed Awards
    • CampaignTech Awards
    • Rising Stars
  • Consultant Directory
  • Become a Member
  • Shop
  • Job Board
  • Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

One cheer for text message contributions

The Federal Election Commission appears poised to approve a method for donors to make small campaign contributions via text message. But I’m giving the news just one cheer because I’m not convinced text contributions will live up to the buzz.

Why? For one, fundraising via text will be expensive. It also introduces barriers to donor follow-up, and it may benefit only high profile campaigns.

Text collection fees can run 50 percent or higher. While 50 percent may be an acceptable acquisition cost for a new donor, campaigns won’t get the donor’s name, or any contact information other than the mobile phone number. And 50 percent is a very high processing cost for repeat donors when compared to email or web processing for repeat donations.

Not only will campaigns just get mobile phone numbers, but FCC requirements may limit how campaigns can contact those numbers subsequently. The real payoff will not come from a $10 donation, but from the opportunity to re-solicit and otherwise engage the donor. If campaigns can’t successfully contact donors, a $5 net per text won’t go far.

Subscribe for Industry News Plus the Latest in Campaign Strategy & Tactics

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

There is one, and only one, big story about text messaging fundraising success – Haiti. But the Haiti earthquake was a disaster of rare proportions with multi-day wall-to-wall news coverage. This is the rare condition that can trigger impulse giving on a mass level. The Obama and Romney campaigns, and perhaps a few other high profile campaigns, are likely to have some success with text fundraising. But for typical campaigns, the text donation payoff is likely to be tiny.

At Aristotle, we’re excited about any new fundraising technology. We’re just not convinced that text message fundraising will be as big a factor as the news coverage to date seems to expect.

David Mason, a former chairman of the Federal Election Commission, is senior vice president for compliance services at Aristotle International.

Share:
FacebookTweetLinkedIn

Primary Sidebar

By
David Mason
06/11/2012 12:00 AM EDT
FacebookTweetLinkedIn

C&E Creative Summit 2023 Countdown:

Get Tickets

Most Read

  • Digital Organizing

    How Digital Can Help Thread the Needle in Virginia

  • Sponsored

    Combine Digital Advertising With Direct Mail, The SMART Way

  • Sponsored

    Political Comms Is The Premium Peer-To-Peer Texting Platform

Subscribe for Industry News Plus the Latest in Campaign Strategy & Tactics

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become a member and get access to exclusive content.

Join Today

Footer

Upcoming Events

  • September 21

    Campaigns & Elections Creative Summit

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

For the latest in campaign strategy & tactics plus industry news and analysis, subscribe for free today.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow us

Follow Campaign and Elections for more daily content.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 Political World Communications, LLC

Advertisement

Subscribe for Industry News Plus the Latest in Campaign Strategy & Tactics

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.