• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Shop
  • Jobs Board
Campaigns & Elections logo

Campaigns & Elections

  • Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Articles
    • Industry News
    • CampaignTech
    • Creative
  • Videos
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Reports
  • Expert Database
  • Events
  • Awards
    • Reed Awards
    • CampaignTech Awards
    • Rising Stars
  • Consultant Directory
  • Become a Member
  • Shop
  • Job Board
  • Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Will Political Media Buying Adjust in Time for the Midterms?

Polling station sign in Miami Beach, Florida

Image Credit: tovfla

To target the midterm’s traditionally older electorate, media buyers could be tempted to go big on linear — a tried-and-true strategy that will still see plenty of dollars this year. 

But new research suggests that old ways of buying media might not work as effectively this cycle, especially if you consider that turnout of young voters could spike. To wit, back in 2018 turnout of 18- to 29-year-olds rose to 36 percent — a nearly 80-percent surge — from 20 percent in 2014.

Linear is still the way most people watch TV in America. In fact, the average time per day spent with linear TV is 3:17 per day, according to an analysis by MiQ.

But the problem is that that audience, some 75 percent of which is over the age of 50, is contracting just as more and more ad dollars are being spent by political marketers trying to reach them. 

Subscribe for Industry News Plus the Latest in Campaign Strategy & Tactics

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This imbalance is throwing off the “frequency curve” and means that in some Senate, gubernatorial and congressional races between 2020-21 70-90 percent of the impressions delivered were only to 40 percent of households. Moreover, campaigns from both major parties are overlapping 63 percent of their linear TV ads with the same audience.

“There’s a certain number of households that are constantly over-saturated,” Melissa Kurstin, MiQ’s managing director Mid-Atlantic & Southeast, told C&E. “If you do spread it out, you’ll more effectively hit the under-saturated households. We want to normalize that frequency curve.”

Normalizing that curve by spreading out your ad dollars is something that a programmatic platform like MiQ would like to help campaigns do. 

Still, that isn’t the only reason why the company released this report. Another is that they now have the ACR (Automatic Content Recognition) data from 25 million opted-in households (up from 8 million in 2018) to back up their argument.  

“As we’re able to get access to more households … we’ve proven out that this is actually working,” Kurstin said of a cross-screen buying strategy.

The report, which looked at ACR data from 16 million U.S. households and used AdImpact’s ad library, AdMo, found “20 percent or more of voters were not reached by campaigns that relied heavily on linear TV.”

Not only are linear-heavy strategies missing voters, they’re also getting pricey because there’s fewer voters watching programming that way and more ad dollars targeting them.

“Given that framework, the cost to reach a new household can be 10-to-12 [times] higher based on this analysis in the third month of a campaign compared to the first,” MacKenzie Pino, a senior account executive, at MiQ, said during a Zoom briefing on the report May 24. “As campaigns progress towards Election Day, and time passes, reach becomes increasingly expensive because advertisers aren’t reaching new voters. Instead, they’re hitting the same ones over and over again.”

She added: “We posit that linear TV strategies consistently face over- and under-frequency saturation levels.” 

In the case of the latter, the report found that broadly there was “a four to-five day lag on average between successive impressions for audiences seeing more than one [campaign] commercial.” 

At the same time, MIQ’s analysis found that the average household consumes more than “300 ads on TV alone during those four and five day gaps.”

“There’s evidence,” said Pino, “that cross-platform ad exposure is more effective.”

Share:
FacebookTweetLinkedIn
Filed Under:
Digital Advertising, Media Buying, Television

Primary Sidebar

By
Sean J. Miller
05/31/2022 08:47 AM EDT
FacebookTweetLinkedIn

C&E Creative Summit 2023 Countdown:

Get Tickets

Most Read

  • Digital Organizing

    How Digital Can Help Thread the Needle in Virginia

  • Sponsored

    Combine Digital Advertising With Direct Mail, The SMART Way

  • Sponsored

    Political Comms Is The Premium Peer-To-Peer Texting Platform

Subscribe for Industry News Plus the Latest in Campaign Strategy & Tactics

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Related Articles

See More Media Buying Articles
Close-up of woman changing channels on TV at home.
Media Buying

No Reservations: Why Campaigns Need to Bust the Early Booking Myth

Netflix streaming with a tablet
OTT

Political Media Buyers Are Waiting On a Decision From Netflix

Television

The Lost Art of Storytelling in Political Creative

Become a member and get access to exclusive content.

Join Today

Footer

Upcoming Events

  • September 21

    Campaigns & Elections Creative Summit

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

For the latest in campaign strategy & tactics plus industry news and analysis, subscribe for free today.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow us

Follow Campaign and Elections for more daily content.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 Political World Communications, LLC

Advertisement

Subscribe for Industry News Plus the Latest in Campaign Strategy & Tactics

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.